factors. Completion of the job analysis results in identification of
ergonomic stresses, design of interventions and follow-up evaluation of the
interventions.
There are two levels of job analysis. They are:
1. Surveys/Walkthroughs (Level 1) are a basic method of identifying risk
factors associated with the performance of work. Service unit ergonomics
teams, in consultation with health care and safety professionals, conduct
the surveys. Checklists are useful in completion of the
survey/walkthrough. Other resource material is available in Safety
Services.
2. Analysis (Level 2): Ergonomics team members conduct detailed job
analysis in work areas after determining and prioritizing those jobs that
warrant analysis. All personnel conducting ergonomic job analysis must
have received specific training in ergonomic job analysis and
intervention techniques. The job analysis process identifies and ranks
specific risk factors, documents job attributes, and assesses ergonomic
stress factors.
a. Documentation: The following constitute documentation of the job
analysis:
(1) Position description: The official position description
permits the analyst to compare job function to the intended goal/objective.
It is possible that the findings of the analysis may support changes in
position descriptions.
(2) Direct observation: Risk factors in a job or work area
studied can be determined by direct observation. The analysis includes, as
necessary, upper extremity repetitive measurements for total hand
manipulations per cycle, cycle time and total manipulations or cycles per
shift. Where appropriate force measurement determinations are needed these
can be estimated as an average effort or peak force. Force measurements
can be obtained using appropriate test equipment (if available).
(3) Supervisor/employee interviews: Staff, including labor
organization representatives, provide a broad knowledge base regarding job
history and problems. All job analysis includes on-site interviews with
employees, supervisors, and labor organization representatives.
(4) Videotaping is the preferred method of documenting a
specific job analysis, in most cases. It helps the analyst understand the
task demands on the worker, and how each worker accomplishes the task.
Videotaping requires the presence and activity of the worker. Use of a
checklist aids in accurate documentation of conditions present during the
analysis. Where videotape equipment is not available use of a checklist is
even more important.
b. Assessment of Ergonomic Stresses: During the detailed analysis,
some specific actions and/or potential stressors are evaluated for impact
on the worker. There are four specific stressors for which the analyst
should be alert. They are noted below.
(1) Repeated and sustained static exertions: Does the
performance of work, required in the position description, require these
exertions, or do they result from a work practice?
(2) Forceful exertions: Where forceful exertions are
identified in the analysis some specific steps may be required for
evaluation and intervention. It may be necessary to estimate loads and
friction resistance, make posture adjustments, determine need for
mechanical aids, consider use of gloves, and evaluate muscle use with tools
such as resistance meters and surface electromyography equipment.
(3) Localized mechanical stresses: Does the work require
specific forces and/or contact with areas of the worker's body?
(4) Posture stresses: Identification of posture stresses can
be accomplished through job analysis observation and/or video tape. The
analysis may be supplemented with instrumentation noted in (2) above,
analysis of orientation of the worker in relation to the work, review of
types of tools used, and use of anthropometric data.
Design of Jobs.
When considering design or redesign of jobs the objective is to
minimize ergonomic stresses present in the performance of the work.
Interventions considered must eliminate or reduce employee exposure to the
potential for suffering from CTDs and other back and upper extremity pain,
while allowing accomplishment of the organization's mission.
1. Propose interventions. A complete job analysis includes reporting
of the findings, recommendations for design of control measures, and
evaluation of actions taken. The report may be formal or less formal,
depending on the extent of recommendations for change. Intervention is
accomplished through the application of appropriate engineering changes,
and/or implementation of
administrative control for the work. Intervention is followed by
evaluation.
1.1 Engineering Changes include actual modifications to the physical
work site and any tools or equipment used in the work process.
Determination of needed changes may require assistance of medical, safety
and other recognized experts.
(1) Tools - Are power assists available? Can handles be
changed?
(2) Machines/Equipment - Are changes necessary to the
equipment? Economic impact may be a necessary consideration in some cases.
1.2 Administrative Controls are necessary as interim protective
measures, pending completion of required engineering changes. In some
situations administrative controls may be the only intervention needed.
(1) Work area - Can changes be made in the work/equipment
location and orientation? Are proper chairs used?
(2) Methods - Is there another way to do the work? Is job
rotation allowed?
(3) Standards - If standards are established for the
work, are they realistic, up-to-date?
(4) Schedules - Are schedules flexible enough to provide
periodic rest breaks and/or on-the-job exercises? Are work schedules
flexible?
(5) Education/Training - Are employees trained to recognize
problems and take proper action?
(6) Maintenance - Is equipment with moving parts, e.g.,
wheels, lifts, etc., properly inspected and maintained?
3. Evaluation. Each intervention action taken to prevent/reduce CTDs and
other related disorders requires follow-up evaluation to assess
effectiveness of the action. The evaluation can be accomplished through:
a. Job Analysis - using the methods described above,
and/or
b. Active/Passive Surveillance - methods described in
Surveillance.
c. Assessment - evaluation of information from a. and b. above
to determine whether the goal has been achieved
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
The goal of medical management is to ensure evaluation, diagnosis and
treatment of repetitive strain disorders, and to provide avenues for
prevention. Integration of medical management is essential to the success
of the program. All medical evaluations, records, and data as well as
results of surveys etc. are handled in a manner which preserves the
anonymity of individual employees and maintains the confidentiality of
personal and medical information. The components of this program are:
Accessibility; Health Surveillance; Identification of Restricted-Duty Jobs;
Medical Intervention; and Record-keeping, Data Evaluation, and Action.
Employee investment in the problems, along with early medical
intervention and good open communications between Health Services and other
treating clinicians, are key to success.
Accessibility
The health care providers must be accessible to the employees to
facilitate treatment, surveillance activities, and recording of
information. This may be accomplished via walkthroughs and educational
initiatives. The walkthrough increases visibility and provides a forum for
interaction and exchange of information.
Health Services undertakes educational initiatives for different
types of cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs), their causes, prevention, etc.
These are carried out through new employee orientation, health forums,
_Gazette_ articles, brochures, posters, etc.
Health Surveillance.
The Health Services Office serves as a principal member of the
surveillance team assessing and analyzing symptoms surveys, and encouraging
and receiving early reports of symptoms. This role is more clearly
outlined under Surveillance.
Identification of Restricted-Duty Jobs
The objective of a restricted-duty assignment is to provide a chance
for healing or rehabilitation of an injured area by assigning the worker to
a position that does not involve the use of the injured muscle-tendon
group. This type of assignment is individualized to each worker. A list or
data base of jobs categorized according to ergonomic risk from high to low
is to be developed. The identification process requires job analysis (see
Analysis and Design of Jobs). As these job analyses are completed,
relevant information is added to the official position description.
Medical Intervention.
Appropriate medical evaluation and care is essential to prevent the
development of more serious medical problems. The main objective of
medical management is to identify and treat disorders at a very early
stage, and minimize progression or exacerbation. This includes health
interviews and examinations. These examinations are in the form of, a
baseline evaluation, a post conditioning period evaluation, and a periodic
assessment. The baseline or preplacement exam would determine capabilities
(as opposed to disabilities) and identify required job restrictions. The
examinations are job-specific, based on the official position description,
initiated by the supervisor or Human Resources, and administered by Health
Services. The post-conditioning evaluation is done no later than 1 month
after a new position is assumed to determine if there are symptoms
consistent with the breaking in of muscles as opposed to the onset of a
cumulative trauma disorder (CTD). The periodic assessment is oriented
towards early detection of health changes in at-risk workers
Responsibilities are outlined in Program Management.
Record-keeping, Data Evaluation, and Action.
It is important to maintain accurate records. OSHA logs, medical
records, compensation reports, and Safety Services injury reports, as well
as the results of symptoms surveillance, are the epidemiological tools in
assessing the workplace and employees and determining trends and costs.
Original sources, used in the work
1. gopher://marvel.loc.gov:70/00/employee/health/ergonomics/program3
2. www.ergosci.com
3. www.osha.com
4. http://www.ergonomics.org/
5. http://www.combo.com/ergo/atwork.htm
6. http://www.usernomics.com/hf.html
7. http://www.cordis.lu/src/g_001_en.htm#SEARCH
8. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/jobstres.html
Страницы: 1, 2, 3